Submitted by Jacqueline Laing on Tue, 2011-04-26 21:28
|Title||Kaufman's Response to Lucretius |
|Publication Type||Journal Article |
|Year of Publication||2008 |
|Authors||Johansson, J |
|Journal||Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
Abstract: The symmetry argument is an objection to the 'deprivation approach'– the account of badness favored by nearly all philosophers who take death to be bad for the one who dies. Frederik Kaufman's recent response to the symmetry argument is a development of Thomas Nagel's suggestion that we could not have come into existence substantially earlier than we in fact did. In this paper, I aim to show that Kaufman's suggestion fails. I also consider several possible modifications of his theory, and argue that they are unsuccessful as well.